Tuesday, March 25, 2008

the tax man cometh


[Note: I need to add a disclaimer to this posting. It contains information about legal matters in Mexico. I am no expert in that area, and I do not purport to be giving any legal advice. I cannot even attest that all of the facts I have picked up in writing this post are accurate. Having said that, it is an area I find fascinating.]


Foreigners move to Mexico for various reasons -- some for the weather, some for the culture, some for the cultural values, some for just being somewhere else. The inimitable Michael Dickson says there are only five reasons to move to Mexico from the States: (1) cheaper real estate and rentals, (2) cheaper utilities, (3) lower property taxes, (4) superior health care, and (5) for single men, Mexican wives, "who are a dream come true."


But, for most expatriates, the conversation often turns to a perceived lower cost of living. And housing is always high on that list.


I have recently run across an issue, though, that has raised the hackles of some homeowners when they sell their property: the dreaded capital gains tax. Taxing profits on homes is a hot political issue in every society where home ownership is encouraged. The United States has tried several tax mechanisms. On one hand, it is not fair for profits not to be taxed; pn the other hand, residences are a unique class of property.


Mexico is no different. The language of the Mexican capital gains tax statute is simple and has exactly the same type of social interests at stake as does the law in the States. If the home is the primary residence of the seller, the seller may be entitled to an exemption from the capital gains derived from the sale.


And that is where the simple part ends. The application of the law is starting to cause greater problems for foreigners who sell their Mexican homes.


The first problem is proving that the home is the "primary residence" of the seller. Many foreigners try to maintain a primary residence both in Mexico and in their home country. Primary means just what it says. You can only have one. The people who are affected most often by this are the proverbial snow birds.


In an attempt to give a more consistent application to this portion of the law, some notarios will not allow the ca[iyal gains tax exemption if the foreigner has an FM3 visa; the notario will allow exemptions only with an FM2 visa. That makes sense because the FM2 restricts the number of days the visa holder can be absent from Mexico. During the past year, several areas of Mexico have disallowed the exemption for all FM3 holders.


The second problem in proving residence centers around the foreigner's source of income. Some notarios require proof that over 50% of the foreigner's income is derived from Mexican sources. For retirees (and I am soon to be in that category), if that factor is applied strictly, pensions from foreign sources will not qualify. And that will be a large number of current owners of Mexican homes.


So, what happens if you fail the primary residency test? It simply means that a portion of the money you earned on your Mexican property must be paid to the Mexican government (and, of course, potentially to the foreigner's home country, as well). That strikes me as fair. Homeowners are reaping some very nice profits on their sale of homes. Why shouldn't the Mexican government share in that increase in wealth?


What concerns me, though, is that the definitions appear to be applied arbitrarily throughout the country depending on the notario involved. (Not that the same problem does not arise in the States.) A little more consistency would allow sellers to plan on paying the tax -- and ordering their lives accordingly.


Property taxes are very low (insanely low in some places) in Mexico. I suspect that before long, local Mexican governments will discover that property taxes are a great boon to improve local services. Property taxes are low because the extremely wealthy have been able to prevent them from being imposed. As the middle class grows in Mexico, property taxes will be seen as a good source of revenue -- rather than onerous income tax rates.

7 comments:

Babs said...

Well, if that would be the 5 reasons someone would move here I find that very sad! Everything is less expensive, but, that's not the reason to come here, in my humble opinion. The richness of the country and the people and living in a totally different culture to me, enhances life.
About Capital gains - you have to hold the property for 5 years but having an FM-2 (which you could not have in 5 years) or an FM-3 does not affect that, at least in San Miguel.
I DO NOT own property but rent because I decided that paying cash for a residence would leave me with a "dead asset" unless I sold it to have the money. I preferred to invest that money in the USA and live off that income plus my social security. It is MUCH cheaper to rent. You might consider that, for at least the first 6 months you are down here and that way you can determine if the "beach life" or the "interior life" with more cultural things to do is the right fit for you.......It's amazing to me how many people who came 7 years ago when i did are no longer here......it turned out not to be paradise for them........for many reasons. Just "food for thought"!

Babs said...

Ironically I just now received two emails from people in Merida about capital gains info and health care in Mexico. The capital gains info would be interesting because of the close prosimity to the coast. If you're interested, you'll have to send your email address or send me an email at babsofsanmgiuel@yahoo.com and I'll forward it to you.

Steve Cotton said...

Babs -- I am a big believer in renting, but oiwning a house at the beach is still a dream of mine. You are correct, though, I should try it step by step. I emailed you.

Cory said...

"That strikes me as fair". A fair tax? Hmmm, interesting idea.

Renting v. buying ... I like the 6 month rule.

Steve Cotton said...

Cory -- Sure. Even we libertarians believe that some taxes are fair. Not many, but some. And both you and Babs are correct: renting for 6 months in a new area is always a wise idea. Get to know the territory as the Music Man salesmen advise.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for saying it. I have been concerned for years about my gringo neighbors who complain about everything in Mexico and then do not even want to pay for basic services.

Anonymous said...

Within a few years, the idea of having a capital gain on a residence will be laughable, even in Mexico. The steadily swelling tide of delinquencies, foreclosures, and bank auctions of foreclosed properties will ensure that.

Between now and then, there will likely be more bank failures in the U.S. And they won't be institutions like Bear Stearns, whose business is rather arcane to the man-in-the street. They'll be household names like Citibank.

If you already own a US house, and are counting on its value to help you move to Mexico in any less than five years, you should seriously think about selling your house now. Price it to move, or you'll just be facing more competition from your neighbors later on. U.S. real estate is about to go from bad to worse. Unfortunately, this will become a self-feeding cycle, driving more defaults and then more forced sales. As it happens, it is going to crush a lot of dreams.

Take your capital gains now, while you still have them, and be thankful that you have something to pay tax on.

Oh, and if you think this doesn't apply to Mexico, think again. The vast majority of Mexico's exports are sold into the U.S., and U.S. retirees and others have definitely boosted property values in gringo-popular areas such as San Miguel de Allende, Lake Chapala, Baja, etc. Moreover, the Peso is one of the few currencies that has kept up with the dollar to the downside. Whatever you may think, the world's financial markets recognize Mexico's fate as tightly and inextricably tied to that of the U.S.

Renting for a while is a very smart idea.

Regards,

Kim G
Boston, MA